Tag: technews

  • Scaling Statistics: Incremental Standard Deviation in SQL with dbt

    Scaling Statistics: Incremental Standard Deviation in SQL with dbt

    Yuval Gorchover

    Why scan yesterday’s data when you can increment today’s?

    Image by the author

    SQL aggregation functions can be computationally expensive when applied to large datasets. As datasets grow, recalculating metrics over the entire dataset repeatedly becomes inefficient. To address this challenge, incremental aggregation is often employed — a method that involves maintaining a previous state and updating it with new incoming data. While this approach is straightforward for aggregations like COUNT or SUM, the question arises: how can it be applied to more complex metrics like standard deviation?

    Standard deviation is a statistical metric that measures the extent of variation or dispersion in a variable’s values relative to its mean.
    It is derived by taking the square root of the variance.
    The formula for calculating the variance of a sample is as follows:

    Sample variance formula

    Calculating standard deviation can be complex, as it involves updating both the mean and the sum of squared differences across all data points. However, with algebraic manipulation, we can derive a formula for incremental computation — enabling updates using an existing dataset and incorporating new data seamlessly. This approach avoids recalculating from scratch whenever new data is added, making the process much more efficient (A detailed derivation is available on my GitHub).

    Derived sample variance formula

    The formula was basically broken into 3 parts:
    1. The existing’s set weighted variance
    2. The new set’s weighted variance
    3. The mean difference variance, accounting for between-group variance.

    This method enables incremental variance computation by retaining the COUNT (k), AVG (µk), and VAR (Sk) of the existing set, and combining them with the COUNT (n), AVG (µn), and VAR (Sn) of the new set. As a result, the updated standard deviation can be calculated efficiently without rescanning the entire dataset.

    Now that we’ve wrapped our heads around the math behind incremental standard deviation (or at least caught the gist of it), let’s dive into the dbt SQL implementation. In the following example, we’ll walk through how to set up an incremental model to calculate and update these statistics for a user’s transaction data.

    Consider a transactions table named stg__transactions, which tracks user transactions (events). Our goal is to create a time-static table, int__user_tx_state, that aggregates the ‘state’ of user transactions. The column details for both tables are provided in the picture below.

    Image by the author

    To make the process efficient, we aim to update the state table incrementally by combining the new incoming transactions data with the existing aggregated data (i.e. the current user state). This approach allows us to calculate the updated user state without scanning through all historical data.

    Image by the author

    The code below assumes understanding of some dbt concepts, if you’re unfamiliar with it, you may still be able to understand the code, although I strongly encourage going through dbt’s incremental guide or read this awesome post.

    We’ll construct a full dbt SQL step by step, aiming to calculate incremental aggregations efficiently without repeatedly scanning the entire table. The process begins by defining the model as incremental in dbt and using unique_key to update existing rows rather than inserting new ones.

    -- depends_on: {{ ref('stg__transactions') }}
    {{ config(materialized='incremental', unique_key=['USER_ID'], incremental_strategy='merge') }}

    Next, we fetch records from the stg__transactions table.
    The is_incremental block filters transactions with timestamps later than the latest user update, effectively including “only new transactions”.

    WITH NEW_USER_TX_DATA AS (
    SELECT
    USER_ID,
    TX_ID,
    TX_TIMESTAMP,
    TX_VALUE
    FROM {{ ref('stg__transactions') }}
    {% if is_incremental() %}
    WHERE TX_TIMESTAMP > COALESCE((select max(UPDATED_AT) from {{ this }}), 0::TIMESTAMP_NTZ)
    {% endif %}
    )

    After retrieving the new transaction records, we aggregate them by user, allowing us to incrementally update each user’s state in the following CTEs.

    INCREMENTAL_USER_TX_DATA AS (
    SELECT
    USER_ID,
    MAX(TX_TIMESTAMP) AS UPDATED_AT,
    COUNT(TX_VALUE) AS INCREMENTAL_COUNT,
    AVG(TX_VALUE) AS INCREMENTAL_AVG,
    SUM(TX_VALUE) AS INCREMENTAL_SUM,
    COALESCE(STDDEV(TX_VALUE), 0) AS INCREMENTAL_STDDEV,
    FROM
    NEW_USER_TX_DATA
    GROUP BY
    USER_ID
    )

    Now we get to the heavy part where we need to actually calculate the aggregations. When we’re not in incremental mode (i.e. we don’t have any “state” rows yet) we simply select the new aggregations

    NEW_USER_CULMULATIVE_DATA AS (
    SELECT
    NEW_DATA.USER_ID,
    {% if not is_incremental() %}
    NEW_DATA.UPDATED_AT AS UPDATED_AT,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_COUNT AS COUNT_TX,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_AVG AS AVG_TX,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_SUM AS SUM_TX,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_STDDEV AS STDDEV_TX
    {% else %}
    ...

    But when we’re in incremental mode, we need to join past data and combine it with the new data we created in the INCREMENTAL_USER_TX_DATA CTE based on the formula described above.
    We start by calculating the new SUM, COUNT and AVG:

      ...
    {% else %}
    COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.COUNT_TX, 0) AS _n, -- this is n
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_COUNT AS _k, -- this is k
    COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.SUM_TX, 0) + NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_SUM AS NEW_SUM_TX, -- new sum
    COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.COUNT_TX, 0) + NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_COUNT AS NEW_COUNT_TX, -- new count
    NEW_SUM_TX / NEW_COUNT_TX AS AVG_TX, -- new avg
    ...

    We then calculate the variance formula’s three parts

    1. The existing weighted variance, which is truncated to 0 if the previous set is composed of one or less items:

        ...
    CASE
    WHEN _n > 1 THEN (((_n - 1) / (NEW_COUNT_TX - 1)) * POWER(COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.STDDEV_TX, 0), 2))
    ELSE 0
    END AS EXISTING_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE, -- existing weighted variance
    ...

    2. The incremental weighted variance in the same way:

        ...
    CASE
    WHEN _k > 1 THEN (((_k - 1) / (NEW_COUNT_TX - 1)) * POWER(NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_STDDEV, 2))
    ELSE 0
    END AS INCREMENTAL_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE, -- incremental weighted variance
    ...

    3. The mean difference variance, as outlined earlier, along with SQL join terms to include past data.

        ...
    POWER((COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.AVG_TX, 0) - NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_AVG), 2) AS MEAN_DIFF_SQUARED,
    CASE
    WHEN NEW_COUNT_TX = 1 THEN 0
    ELSE (_n * _k) / (NEW_COUNT_TX * (NEW_COUNT_TX - 1))
    END AS BETWEEN_GROUP_WEIGHT, -- between group weight
    BETWEEN_GROUP_WEIGHT * MEAN_DIFF_SQUARED AS MEAN_DIFF_VARIANCE, -- mean diff variance
    EXISTING_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE + INCREMENTAL_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE + MEAN_DIFF_VARIANCE AS VARIANCE_TX,
    CASE
    WHEN _n = 0 THEN NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_STDDEV -- no "past" data
    WHEN _k = 0 THEN EXISTING_USER_DATA.STDDEV_TX -- no "new" data
    ELSE SQRT(VARIANCE_TX) -- stddev (which is the root of variance)
    END AS STDDEV_TX,
    NEW_DATA.UPDATED_AT AS UPDATED_AT,
    NEW_SUM_TX AS SUM_TX,
    NEW_COUNT_TX AS COUNT_TX
    {% endif %}
    FROM
    INCREMENTAL_USER_TX_DATA new_data
    {% if is_incremental() %}
    LEFT JOIN
    {{ this }} EXISTING_USER_DATA
    ON
    NEW_DATA.USER_ID = EXISTING_USER_DATA.USER_ID
    {% endif %}
    )

    Finally, we select the table’s columns, accounting for both incremental and non-incremental cases:

    SELECT
    USER_ID,
    UPDATED_AT,
    COUNT_TX,
    SUM_TX,
    AVG_TX,
    STDDEV_TX
    FROM NEW_USER_CULMULATIVE_DATA

    By combining all these steps, we arrive at the final SQL model:

    -- depends_on: {{ ref('stg__initial_table') }}
    {{ config(materialized='incremental', unique_key=['USER_ID'], incremental_strategy='merge') }}
    WITH NEW_USER_TX_DATA AS (
    SELECT
    USER_ID,
    TX_ID,
    TX_TIMESTAMP,
    TX_VALUE
    FROM {{ ref('stg__initial_table') }}
    {% if is_incremental() %}
    WHERE TX_TIMESTAMP > COALESCE((select max(UPDATED_AT) from {{ this }}), 0::TIMESTAMP_NTZ)
    {% endif %}
    ),
    INCREMENTAL_USER_TX_DATA AS (
    SELECT
    USER_ID,
    MAX(TX_TIMESTAMP) AS UPDATED_AT,
    COUNT(TX_VALUE) AS INCREMENTAL_COUNT,
    AVG(TX_VALUE) AS INCREMENTAL_AVG,
    SUM(TX_VALUE) AS INCREMENTAL_SUM,
    COALESCE(STDDEV(TX_VALUE), 0) AS INCREMENTAL_STDDEV,
    FROM
    NEW_USER_TX_DATA
    GROUP BY
    USER_ID
    ),

    NEW_USER_CULMULATIVE_DATA AS (
    SELECT
    NEW_DATA.USER_ID,
    {% if not is_incremental() %}
    NEW_DATA.UPDATED_AT AS UPDATED_AT,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_COUNT AS COUNT_TX,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_AVG AS AVG_TX,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_SUM AS SUM_TX,
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_STDDEV AS STDDEV_TX
    {% else %}
    COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.COUNT_TX, 0) AS _n, -- this is n
    NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_COUNT AS _k, -- this is k
    COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.SUM_TX, 0) + NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_SUM AS NEW_SUM_TX, -- new sum
    COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.COUNT_TX, 0) + NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_COUNT AS NEW_COUNT_TX, -- new count
    NEW_SUM_TX / NEW_COUNT_TX AS AVG_TX, -- new avg
    CASE
    WHEN _n > 1 THEN (((_n - 1) / (NEW_COUNT_TX - 1)) * POWER(COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.STDDEV_TX, 0), 2))
    ELSE 0
    END AS EXISTING_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE, -- existing weighted variance
    CASE
    WHEN _k > 1 THEN (((_k - 1) / (NEW_COUNT_TX - 1)) * POWER(NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_STDDEV, 2))
    ELSE 0
    END AS INCREMENTAL_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE, -- incremental weighted variance
    POWER((COALESCE(EXISTING_USER_DATA.AVG_TX, 0) - NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_AVG), 2) AS MEAN_DIFF_SQUARED,
    CASE
    WHEN NEW_COUNT_TX = 1 THEN 0
    ELSE (_n * _k) / (NEW_COUNT_TX * (NEW_COUNT_TX - 1))
    END AS BETWEEN_GROUP_WEIGHT, -- between group weight
    BETWEEN_GROUP_WEIGHT * MEAN_DIFF_SQUARED AS MEAN_DIFF_VARIANCE,
    EXISTING_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE + INCREMENTAL_WEIGHTED_VARIANCE + MEAN_DIFF_VARIANCE AS VARIANCE_TX,
    CASE
    WHEN _n = 0 THEN NEW_DATA.INCREMENTAL_STDDEV -- no "past" data
    WHEN _k = 0 THEN EXISTING_USER_DATA.STDDEV_TX -- no "new" data
    ELSE SQRT(VARIANCE_TX) -- stddev (which is the root of variance)
    END AS STDDEV_TX,
    NEW_DATA.UPDATED_AT AS UPDATED_AT,
    NEW_SUM_TX AS SUM_TX,
    NEW_COUNT_TX AS COUNT_TX
    {% endif %}
    FROM
    INCREMENTAL_USER_TX_DATA new_data
    {% if is_incremental() %}
    LEFT JOIN
    {{ this }} EXISTING_USER_DATA
    ON
    NEW_DATA.USER_ID = EXISTING_USER_DATA.USER_ID
    {% endif %}
    )

    SELECT
    USER_ID,
    UPDATED_AT,
    COUNT_TX,
    SUM_TX,
    AVG_TX,
    STDDEV_TX
    FROM NEW_USER_CULMULATIVE_DATA

    Throughout this process, we demonstrated how to handle both non-incremental and incremental modes effectively, leveraging mathematical techniques to update metrics like variance and standard deviation efficiently. By combining historical and new data seamlessly, we achieved an optimized, scalable approach for real-time data aggregation.

    In this article, we explored the mathematical technique for incrementally calculating standard deviation and how to implement it using dbt’s incremental models. This approach proves to be highly efficient, enabling the processing of large datasets without the need to re-scan the entire dataset. In practice, this leads to faster, more scalable systems that can handle real-time updates efficiently. If you’d like to discuss this further or share your thoughts, feel free to reach out — I’d love to hear your thoughts!


    Scaling Statistics: Incremental Standard Deviation in SQL with dbt was originally published in Towards Data Science on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

    Originally appeared here:
    Scaling Statistics: Incremental Standard Deviation in SQL with dbt

    Go Here to Read this Fast! Scaling Statistics: Incremental Standard Deviation in SQL with dbt

  • Keychron Q5 HE review: Marvelously magnetic mechanical keyboard

    Keychron Q5 HE review: Marvelously magnetic mechanical keyboard

    The Keychron Q5 HE is a great mechanical keyboard that proves that magnetic switches are useful for more than gaming.

    Keychron Q5 HE review
    Keychron Q5 HE review

    HE keyboards are a great upgrade for typists and gamers for their durability, precision, and customizability.

    The HE stands for Hall Effect, which describes part of how magnets influence electric charge. This finds its way into keyboards when manufacturers put magnets into the switches and use this effect to sense when a key is pressed much more accurately than an analog mechanical switch.

    Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums

    Go Here to Read this Fast! Keychron Q5 HE review: Marvelously magnetic mechanical keyboard

    Originally appeared here:
    Keychron Q5 HE review: Marvelously magnetic mechanical keyboard

  • My 7 favorite Android widgets to make your phone or tablet more useful

    If you like your Android home screen to give you quick access to information, services, and apps, consider adding a small collection of these widgets.

    Go Here to Read this Fast! My 7 favorite Android widgets to make your phone or tablet more useful

    Originally appeared here:
    My 7 favorite Android widgets to make your phone or tablet more useful

  • 3 great Paramount+ movies to watch on New Year’s Day

    Dan Girolamo

    If you need a movie to watch on New Year’s Day, fire up Paramount+ and one of these films, including a rom-com, a coming-of-age drama, and a legacy sequel.

    Go Here to Read this Fast! 3 great Paramount+ movies to watch on New Year’s Day

    Originally appeared here:
    3 great Paramount+ movies to watch on New Year’s Day

  • NYT Crossword: answers for Wednesday, January 1

    Sam Hill

    The New York Times crossword puzzle can be tough! If you’re stuck, we’re here to help with a list of today’s clues and answers.

    Go Here to Read this Fast! NYT Crossword: answers for Wednesday, January 1

    Originally appeared here:
    NYT Crossword: answers for Wednesday, January 1

  • NYT Mini Crossword today: puzzle answers for Wednesday, January 1

    Sam Hill

    The NYT Mini crossword might be a lot smaller than a normal crossword, but it isn’t easy. If you’re stuck with today’s crossword, we’ve got answers for you here.

    Go Here to Read this Fast! NYT Mini Crossword today: puzzle answers for Wednesday, January 1

    Originally appeared here:
    NYT Mini Crossword today: puzzle answers for Wednesday, January 1